1-32 RANKING, ODDS FOR SUPER BOWL
Despite losing the Super Bowl to the Nick Foles-led
Eagles and despite an offseason filled with questions about stability at the
top of the organization, the Patriots remain the best team in the NFL and the favorite
to win Super Bowl LIII, according to our FPI projections with 100 days to go
until the regular season.
But this isn't a repeat of last season, when we considered
the Patriots the runaway top team in the NFL to the point that they had a coin-flip chance to reach the Super Bowl.
This time around, New England may still be the best, but it
is really a part of a three-team tier of the NFL's elite. The other two teams
to make up the league's upper crust? The Eagles and Steelers.
So what makes the FPI like the Patriots, Eagles and
Steelers? You can read more about the process here, but the model considers each team's win total at the
Westgate Las Vegas SuperBook, how that team performed on offense, defense and
special teams last season, how many starters are returning, and who the
starting and backup quarterbacks are. FPI's full list of ratings and
projections can always be found here.
The Eagles finished last season first in total efficiency
across the game's three phases, but despite that and the fact that Brady is 40
years old, New England grabbed the top spot in part due to its higher Vegas win
total.
It's also no surprise that the Patriots, Steelers and Eagles
are also the three most likely teams to win the Super Bowl.
BEST CHANCE TO WIN SUPER BOWL
|
|
New England
Patriots
|
18%
|
Pittsburgh
Steelers
|
14%
|
Philadelphia
Eagles
|
11%
|
Minnesota
Vikings
|
6%
|
Green Bay
Packers
|
6%
|
MOST LIKELY SUPER BOWL MATCHUPS
|
|
New England
Patriots vs. Philadelphia
Eagles
|
6%
|
Philadelphia
Eagles vs. Pittsburgh
Steelers
|
5%
|
New England
Patriots vs. Minnesota
Vikings
|
4%
|
New England
Patriots vs. Green Bay
Packers
|
4%
|
New Orleans
Saints vs. New England
Patriots
|
4%
|
The Patriots are still No. 1, however, and are part of five of
the six most likely Super Bowl combinations.
IS THE NFC THE NEW
WESTERN CONFERENCE?
The FPI started making preseason projections in 2015, and
since then the conference divide within the top 10 of its rankings has been
fairly even (6/4 splits in 2017 and 2015 with an even 5/5 divide in 2016). The
balance of power for the 2018 season looks a little more like the NBA, with the
NFC playing the role of the Western Conference.
The NFC owns eight of the top 10 teams and nine of the top
12 in the FPI's initial iteration. The configuration is a little different when
compared to the NBA's Western Conference as there is no Warriors-like
overwhelming title favorite in the NFC, but the depth at the top overall is
quite similar.
All four divisions in the NFC have a team that ranks within
the FPI's top six, with multiple representatives from the NFC West (Rams second, 49ers 10th)
and NFC North (Vikings fifth, Packers seventh)
inside the top 10.
The AFC does boast two of FPI's top three teams in New
England and Pittsburgh, but you have to go down all the way to No. 14 to get a
representative from the other two divisions (Los Angeles
Chargers at 11 and Jacksonville
Jaguars at 14). The AFC also holds the dubious distinction of
being home to four of the five teams at the bottom of the rankings, including
each of the bottom three.
This results in a wide-open race for the Super Bowl in the
NFC, where five teams are all given a 10 percent chance or better at making the
Super Bowl, compared to just two in the AFC.
WHO WILL MAKE THE
JUMP TO THE POSTSEASON?
Every year since the 12-team playoff format started in 1990,
at least four teams have reached the postseason that failed to do so the year
before. If that pattern were to hold true in 2018, the most likely teams to
ascend to the playoffs are the Packers, Chargers, Texans and
49ers.
It's easy to determine what the model sees in those four
teams. The Packers' level of play dropped off when they were forced to
put Brett Hundley under
center, but with Aaron Rodgers back
to normal health, they are a prime candidate to return to the postseason. Los
Angeles was frankly good enough to get in last year -- FPI actually considered
the Chargers the fourth-best team in the league by the end of the season -- but
likely just fell on the wrong side of some random variance. The Texans received
extraordinary play from Deshaun
Watson when healthy (Total QBR of 81.3), and with the model
assuming normal health for the former Clemson QB,
Houston has a 30 percent chance to win the AFC South. And quite clearly, the
49ers are a different team after acquiring Jimmy
Garoppolo midway through last season.
2018 FOOTBALL POWER INDEX PROJECTIONS
|
|||||
Team
|
Wins
|
Playoffs
|
Division
|
Reach SB
|
Win SB
|
New England
Patriots
|
10.5
|
89%
|
83%
|
32%
|
18%
|
Pittsburgh
Steelers
|
10.0
|
80%
|
65%
|
24%
|
14%
|
Philadelphia
Eagles
|
9.9
|
74%
|
62%
|
20%
|
11%
|
Green Bay
Packers
|
9.5
|
61%
|
41%
|
12%
|
6%
|
Minnesota
Vikings
|
9.4
|
60%
|
40%
|
12%
|
6%
|
Los Angeles
Rams
|
9.2
|
58%
|
45%
|
12%
|
6%
|
New Orleans
Saints
|
9.2
|
55%
|
36%
|
11%
|
6%
|
Atlanta
Falcons
|
9.0
|
51%
|
32%
|
8%
|
4%
|
Carolina
Panthers
|
8.8
|
46%
|
27%
|
6%
|
3%
|
Los Angeles
Chargers
|
8.7
|
54%
|
37%
|
8%
|
4%
|
San
Francisco 49ers
|
8.7
|
46%
|
32%
|
7%
|
3%
|
Kansas City
Chiefs
|
8.6
|
51%
|
33%
|
7%
|
3%
|
Jacksonville
Jaguars
|
8.5
|
50%
|
35%
|
7%
|
3%
|
Dallas
Cowboys
|
8.5
|
41%
|
25%
|
5%
|
2%
|
Houston
Texans
|
8.4
|
47%
|
30%
|
4%
|
2%
|
Baltimore
Ravens
|
8.4
|
46%
|
24%
|
6%
|
2%
|
Tennessee
Titans
|
8.2
|
43%
|
27%
|
4%
|
2%
|
Seattle
Seahawks
|
7.9
|
31%
|
19%
|
3%
|
1%
|
Oakland
Raiders
|
7.9
|
36%
|
20%
|
3%
|
1%
|
Detroit
Lions
|
7.7
|
25%
|
13%
|
2%
|
1%
|
Denver
Broncos
|
6.9
|
20%
|
10%
|
1%
|
0%
|
Cincinnati
Bengals
|
6.9
|
18%
|
8%
|
1%
|
<1%
|
Buffalo
Bills
|
6.9
|
19%
|
8%
|
1%
|
<1%
|
Chicago
Bears
|
6.8
|
12%
|
6%
|
1%
|
<1%
|
Indianapolis
Colts
|
6.8
|
17%
|
9%
|
1%
|
<1%
|
Washington
Redskins
|
6.7
|
13%
|
7%
|
1%
|
<1%
|
Tampa Bay
Buccaneers
|
6.5
|
10%
|
5%
|
<1%
|
<1%
|
New York
Giants
|
6.5
|
10%
|
6%
|
<1%
|
<1%
|
Miami
Dolphins
|
6.3
|
13%
|
6%
|
1% <1%
|
|
New York
Jets
|
6.1
|
10%
|
4%
|
<1%
|
<1%
|
Arizona
Cardinals
|
6.1
|
7%
|
4%
|
<1%
|
<1%
|
Cleveland
Browns
|
5.7
|
7%
|
3%
|
<1%
|
<1%
|
• Though the Jets have
the worst FPI rating in the league, it's the Cardinals that
actually are the longest shot to reach the postseason. The Jets have the
benefit of playing in the same division as two other weak teams: the Dolphins and Bills.
The Browns also
are expected to be a worse team than Arizona but have an easier schedule. All
three teams have a fair amount of uncertainty at quarterback, with a
first-round rookie currently slated as the backup in the model.
• The Packers rank seventh in the FPI overall, but actually
have the second-best chance (19 percent) to land the No. 1 seed in the stacked
NFC, behind only the Eagles (23 percent). That's because Green Bay is the
beneficiary of the eighth-easiest schedule in the league. Green Bay (41
percent) narrowly is the favorite to win the NFC North over the Vikings (40
percent).
• Aside from the Packers, there is only one other team
favored by the FPI to win its division that didn't win it last year: the
Chargers (37 percent), who edge out the Chiefs (33
percent).
THE RAMS'
RESTOCKED DEFENSE
In addition to rating and ranking teams, the FPI also
evaluates all three phases of the game for each team.
2018 FPI UNIT
RATINGS
TEAM
|
OFF. RATING
|
RANK
|
DEF. RATING
|
RANK
|
ST RATING
|
RANK
|
New England
Patriots
|
5.0
|
2
|
-0.3
|
17
|
0.3
|
6
|
Philadelphia
Eagles
|
2.9
|
6
|
1.7
|
5
|
0.1
|
13
|
Pittsburgh
Steelers
|
4.1
|
3
|
0.3
|
12
|
0.2
|
10
|
Los Angeles
Rams
|
1.3
|
10
|
2.4
|
2
|
0.0
|
16
|
Minnesota
Vikings
|
-1.0
|
20
|
4.8
|
1
|
-0.2
|
24
|
New Orleans
Saints
|
5.6
|
1
|
-2.2
|
32
|
0.2
|
8
|
Green Bay
Packers
|
3.6
|
5
|
-0.4
|
18
|
0.1
|
15
|
Atlanta
Falcons
|
3.7
|
4
|
-1.4
|
27
|
0.4
|
2
|
Carolina
Panthers
|
0.8
|
11
|
1.2
|
7
|
0.2
|
9
|
San
Francisco 49ers
|
1.4
|
9
|
0.4
|
11
|
0.0
|
18
|
Los Angeles
Chargers
|
1.7
|
8
|
0.5
|
10
|
-0.5
|
29
|
Dallas
Cowboys
|
2.3
|
7
|
-1.1
|
25
|
0.3
|
7
|
Kansas City
Chiefs
|
-0.4
|
17
|
1.3
|
6
|
0.4
|
4
|
Jacksonville
Jaguars
|
-0.5
|
19
|
1.8
|
4
|
-0.2
|
22
|
Baltimore
Ravens
|
-1.5
|
21
|
1.2
|
8
|
0.9
|
1
|
Seattle
Seahawks
|
-0.1
|
15
|
0.6
|
9
|
0.0
|
17
|
Detroit
Lions
|
0.4
|
13
|
-0.4
|
19
|
0.1
|
14
|
Oakland
Raiders
|
0.5
|
12
|
-0.9
|
24
|
0.2
|
12
|
Houston
Texans
|
0.1
|
14
|
-0.2
|
16
|
-0.2
|
23
|
Tennessee
Titans
|
-0.3
|
16
|
-0.5
|
20
|
0.4
|
5
|
Washington
Redskins
|
-1.9
|
23
|
0.1
|
14
|
-0.4
|
27
|
Tampa Bay
Buccaneers
|
-0.5
|
18
|
-1.7
|
28
|
-0.5
|
28
|
Denver
Broncos
|
-3.9
|
32
|
2.0
|
3
|
-0.7
|
31
|
Chicago
Bears
|
-2.9
|
28
|
0.3
|
13
|
0.0
|
20
|
Cincinnati
Bengals
|
-1.7
|
22
|
-0.8
|
22
|
-0.3
|
26
|
New York
Giants
|
-2.2
|
25
|
0.0
|
15
|
-0.8
|
32
|
Buffalo
Bills
|
-2.4
|
26
|
-0.9
|
23
|
0.2
|
11
|
Indianapolis
Colts
|
-1.9
|
24
|
-1.9
|
30
|
0.4
|
3
|
Arizona
Cardinals
|
-3.1
|
30
|
-0.6
|
21
|
-0.1
|
21
|
Miami
Dolphins
|
-3.2
|
31
|
-1.3
|
26
|
0.0
|
19
|
Cleveland
Browns
|
-2.8
|
27
|
-1.8
|
29
|
-0.5
|
30
|
New York
Jets
|
-3.0
|
29
|
-2.0
|
31
|
-0.2
|
25
|
After finishing last season as the FPI's top defense, it's
no surprise to see the Vikings as the No. 1 defense heading into the 2018
season. The big surprise comes at No. 2, where the Rams make the jump after
finishing last season as the 11th-ranked defensive unit (and the eighth-most efficient).
It's a good example of the way in which FPI works: Though the model doesn't
explicitly consider the substantial acquisitions of non-quarterbacks such
as Aqib Talib, Ndamukong Suh, Marcus Peters and Brandin Cooks (and
the departure of players like Trumaine
Johnson), those changes are in some way reflected in the team's
Vegas win total. If the betting market believes a team improved over the offseason,
the increase in rating is distributed to each side of the ball based on what it
already knows about that team's strengths and weaknesses.
Because the FPI remains somewhat skeptical of Jared Goff --
the former Calquarterback improved after a disastrous rookie campaign but
still finished only 16th in Total QBR last year -- it makes the assumption that
more of the improvement is coming on the defensive side of the ball.
Other notable takeaways from individual unit strengths:
• The FPI is not buying the Saints'
defensive resurgence, as the model has pegged New Orleans as having the worst
defense in the NFL, though it remains a top contender because it has the best
offense. All last season, the model thought the praise being heaped on the New
Orleans defense was a bit overstated, though it is somewhat surprising to see
the defense ranked this low.
• Last year the FPI anticipated the Broncos' decline. Now, it still believes
that the Broncos' defense is excellent (No. 3 overall), but it's not
buying the addition of Case Keenum as
a major improvement to their offense. Because Keenum is a quarterback, he is
specifically factored into the Broncos' rating, but nonetheless the model sees
Denver as having the worst offense in the NFL. Though Keenum finished second in
Total QBR last season with a 69.7, the FPI looks at his entire body of work
throughout his career, which is much more mediocre (career QBR of 52.0). In
addition, the model is slightly less confident in quarterbacks like
Keenum, Kirk Cousins and Alex Smith this
year because they switched teams in the offseason.
TEXANS, BUCS ON
OPPOSITE STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE POLES
Basic strength of schedule formulas based on wins and losses
from the previous season really don't do the statistic justice. The very idea
of strength of schedule is exactly the reason why we ought to know that
opponents' records aren't a good measure of their strength -- who knows how
good the teams were that the opponents played, and so on, and so on ...
Fortunately, the FPI is here to help. And there can be some
large discrepancies.
10 TOUGHEST 2018
SCHEDULES
|
|
TEAM
|
SOS RANK
|
Tampa Bay
Buccaneers
|
1
|
Los Angeles
Rams
|
2
|
Arizona
Cardinals
|
3
|
New York
Giants
|
4
|
Washington
Redskins
|
5
|
New Orleans
Saints
|
6
|
Seattle
Seahawks
|
7
|
Detroit
Lions
|
8
|
Cleveland
Browns
|
9
|
Carolina
Panthers
|
10
|
10 EASIEST 2018
SCHEDULES
|
|
Team
|
SOS Rank
|
Houston
Texans
|
32
|
New England
Patriots
|
31
|
Tennessee
Titans
|
30
|
New York
Jets
|
29
|
Miami
Dolphins
|
28
|
Buffalo
Bills
|
27
|
Indianapolis
Colts
|
26
|
Green Bay
Packers
|
25
|
Baltimore
Ravens
|
24
|
Pittsburgh
Steelers
|
23
|
For example: The Packers have the toughest strength of
schedule in the traditional calculation. But their schedule is ranked only 25th
in difficulty according to the FPI because they play teams like the Bills (nine
wins last year) and the Cardinals (eight), whom we expect to be much worse than
their win totals a season ago.
• It's interesting to note that the Giants,
who are coming off a 3-13 campaign but are sticking with Eli Manning and
trying to win now, face the fourth-toughest schedule in the league.
• The Patriots have the second-easiest schedule, thanks in
part to playing in a division with three other teams that all rank 27th or
worse in the FPI.
BROWNS ON THE
CLOCK, AGAIN?
New quarterbacks, same results?
After a winless 2017 campaign, the FPI has labeled the
Browns as the most likely team to earn the No. 1 pick in the 2019 draft, though
frankly, a lot of the factors involved in that prediction can change
substantially. Despite having Tyrod Taylor --
whom the model likes -- as their likely starter to begin the season, the Browns
have a 14 percent chance to earn the top pick in the 2019 draft.
For Browns fans looking for some hope, there's this: The FPI
currently considers Baker
Mayfield the backup and treats all rookie quarterbacks the
same. That's because there's quite a bit of uncertainty about quarterbacks who
have never taken a snap in the NFL, but it also means that if Mayfield plays
and plays effectively, that projection can change in a hurry. Of course,
there's no guarantee that will happen.
TEAM
|
NO. 1 CHANCE
|
TOP-5 CHANCE
|
Cleveland
Browns
|
14%
|
48%
|
New York
Jets
|
12%
|
43%
|
Arizona
Cardinals
|
9%
|
37%
|
Miami
Dolphins
|
9%
|
37%
|
New York
Giants
|
7%
|
31%
|
Indianapolis
Colts
|
6%
|
28%
|
Tampa Bay
Buccaneers
|
6%
|
29%
|
Washington
Redskins
|
6%
|
27%
|
Cincinnati
Bengals
|
5%
|
27%
|
Chicago
Bears
|
5%
|
27%
|
The Jets are in a similar situation, with Josh McCown labeled
as the starter and Sam Darnold set
as the backup. In the FPI's opinion, the Jets would be best off with Teddy
Bridgewater starting under center, though it doesn't explicitly
consider Bridgewater's injury.
IS IT LIGHTS OUT
FOR TEAMS THAT LOSE TOP QBS?
At one point this offseason, a Tom Brady retirement seemed at least plausible. Had Brady actually hung it up,
would the Patriots have been the Super Bowl favorites that they are today?
Would they still win the AFC East?
With the help of the FPI, the answer to those questions: no
and maybe, respectively.
We ran the model in a world where Brady called it quits, and
not only were the Patriots no longer the best team in football ... but they
fell all the way 18th. In the scenario, New England still had a 55 percent
chance to win its division -- it helps to have just about the most feeble
competition possible -- but only a 3 percent shot to win the Super Bowl (down
from 18 percent in actuality).
And that got us thinking, with FPI able to move quarterbacks
around, what other alternative realities could we imagine?
For example, staying in the AFC East ... what if the Jets
had won the Kirk Cousins sweepstakes?
They'd be better, that's for sure. But according to the FPI:
still bad. Don't get us wrong: The FPI thinks Cousins is a good deal better
than McCown or Darnold, but the quarterback is only one piece of the puzzle.
Even with Cousins wearing green and white, the Jets would still be the
30th-ranked team and would have only a 16 percent chance to reach the playoffs
(up from 10 percent).
What if we know Carson Wentz is
healthy to start the season?
Or in Week 5? Or Week 10? We'll sum it up like this: The
difference in the Eagles' chances to win, in the model's mind, between Wentz
and Nick Foles is
generally about 4 percentage points per game. After all, we've seen that Foles
is a capable fill-in. In Week 1, we give Philadelphia a 65 percent chance to
beat Atlanta with Wentz under center and a 61 percent with Foles.
But all those percentage points do add up: We would project
over 10 wins with 16 games of Wentz, but 9.4 if all 16 are with Foles.
The gap between backup and starter isn't always so small.
For example ...
How much better are the Colts with Andrew Luck than
without him?
Quite a bit. The difference between him and Jacoby
Brissett hovers around 11 percentage points per game. The Colts
are about a seven-win team with Luck and just better than a five-win team with
Brissett, so there's a real difference there. Luck is held in high esteem by
the FPI, but, similar to the aforementioned Jets scenario, he isn't the only
part of the equation. In order for the Colts to be playoff contenders, they'll
need more than just Luck's health to break in their favor.
PREDICTING THE
GAMES OF THE YEAR
A season ago the Patriots and Steelers squared off in what
many presumed would be a precursor to a playoff showdown between the two teams.
It never happened. But we will get another game between New England and
Pittsburgh -- in Week 15, no less -- this season. And according to our pregame
matchup quality metric, which considers the quality of the two teams in the
contest, that is the best game of the year.
Visitor
|
Home
|
Week
|
Matchup quality
|
Home team wins
|
Patriots
|
Steelers
|
15
|
78.3
|
58%
|
Vikings
|
Eagles
|
5
|
75
|
61%
|
Eagles
|
Saints
|
11
|
75
|
57%
|
Steelers
|
Saints
|
16
|
74.9
|
56%
|
Vikings
|
Packers
|
2
|
73.4
|
58%
|
Visitor
|
Home
|
Week
|
Playoff leverage
|
Home team wins
|
Rams
|
49ers
|
7
|
49.90%
|
53%
|
49ers
|
Rams
|
17
|
49.30%
|
65%
|
Cowboys
|
Eagles
|
10
|
49.20%
|
74%
|
Jaguars
|
Texans
|
17
|
48.60%
|
55%
|
Falcons
|
Panthers
|
16
|
48.20%
|
57%
|
But in terms of playoff chances, Patriots-Steelers is not
actually the most important game of the year. For that, we can look at leverage
-- the percentage chance to reach the playoffs each team can gain or lose
depending on the result. And if we look at that, we get a whole different set
of games with high stakes to look forward to in the upcoming year.
No comments:
Post a Comment