Two offseasons ago, I wrote a column asking which 2016
playoff team was least likely to make the postseason in 2017. I picked
the Toronto Blue
Jays. I was right! The Blue Jays fell from 89 wins to 76 and missed
the playoffs.
If I remember correctly, my reasoning focused on the age of
a Toronto lineup that dropped from 891 runs scored in 2015 to 759 in 2016 and
looked vulnerable in 2017 (when the Blue Jays scored 693 runs). The Blue Jays
did not have the biggest drop in wins of the 2016 playoff teams, though.
The Baltimore
Orioles fell 14 wins, the Texas Rangers and New York Mets both
dipped 17 wins and the San Francisco
Giants declined a whopping 23 wins, from 87 to 64.
My editors have asked me to revisit this idea, and the
question seems especially pertinent this offseason, given the slow-moving
action in free agency has resulted in a lot of criticism levied toward teams
that have remained quiet. Of the teams that won fewer than 80 games last
season, only the Cincinnati
Red sand Mets have displayed much desire to try to improve through
trades and/or free agency.
One thing I wanted to know: Is a playoff team more likely to
have made the playoffs the previous season or more likely
to miss the playoffs the following season? I went back to
1996, the first full season of the wild-card era. This gives us 198 teams to
look at.
A World Series winner two Novembers ago, owner Tom Ricketts'
team still has a championship core. But the Cubs haven't done much to build on
that this offseason.
MADE THE PLAYOFFS THE PREVIOUS SEASON: 50.0
percent (99 of 198)
MADE THE PLAYOFFS THE FOLLOWING SEASON: 51.6
percent (97 of 188)
Of course, the addition of the second wild card in 2012
added a fifth playoff team per league to the mix. Let's see how that changes
the numbers.
1996-2011
MADE THE PLAYOFFS THE
PREVIOUS SEASON: 50.0 percent (64 of 128)
MADE THE PLAYOFFS THE
FOLLOWING SEASON: 50.8 percent (65 of 128)
2012-2018
MADE THE PLAYOFFS THE
PREVIOUS SEASON: 50.0 percent (35 of 70)
MADE THE PLAYOFFS THE
FOLLOWING SEASON: 53.3 percent (32 of 60)
In theory, the addition of the second wild card was supposed
to create more incentive for teams to push for the playoffs, also resulting in
more turnovers in the postseason from year to year. Instead, we've seen the
same 50 percent turnover rate. That would suggest five of our 10 playoff teams
from 2018 won't make it this upcoming season.
I do wonder, however: If fewer teams are "going for
it" these days, do playoff windows last longer? Let's look at each playoff
team's three-year window and see how many teams made it to the playoffs all
three seasons:
1996-2011: 28.9 percent (37 of 128)
2012-2018: 25.0 percent (15 of 60)
It's a smaller sample size, but no real change -- although
it's worth noting that seven of 2018's 10 playoff teams also made the playoffs
in 2017 and thus have the chance to make the playoffs in every season of their
three-year window. (In 2017, five of 10 teams were playoff repeaters. It also
was five of 10 in 2016.)
A couple of baseball's greatest dynasties dominated the
1996-2011 era: The New York
Yankees made the playoffs every season from 1995 to 2007, while
the Atlanta
Braves made it every campaign from 1995 to 2005. Those two
franchises account for 20 of the 37 three-year runs. The longest current
playoff run belongs to the Los Angeles
Dodgers, at six seasons in a row (all division titles). The Chicago Cubs are
at four, while the Boston Red
Sox and Cleveland
Indians sit at three.
There might be better ways to look at this, but while we
seemingly have had a long list of rebuilding teams recently, this study is a
reminder that there always are bad franchises. Perhaps the difference is that
some of today's rebuilding teams have arrived there by choice as opposed to the
mere incompetence that might have ruled in the past.
Anyway, the Red Sox, Yankees, Indians and Houston
Astros are strong favorites to return to the postseason, even
as we wait for rosters to finalize. If there is playoff turnover in 2019, it's
more likely to come from a crowded National League playoff picture. Let's rank
last year's 10 playoff teams, from least likely to miss the playoffs to most
likely:
10. NEW YORK
YANKEES
The American League is so top heavy and the Yankees' lineup
so deep that it's almost impossible to imagine a scenario where they miss the
playoffs, even if their starting pitching falls apart. If that does happen,
Aaron Boone can simply ride the best bullpen in the majors. Throw in some likely
better numbers from Aaron Judge, Giancarlo
Stanton and Gary Sanchez and
the Yankees look more than capable of topping last year's 100 wins.
9. HOUSTON
ASTROS
The advantage the Astros have over the Yankees and Red Sox is
that Houston doesn't have them as division opponents. Yes, the Athletics
won 97 games last season, but do you see that happening again? That means the
Astros should cruise to another division title. The Astros do have a few
questions to sort out in the rotation -- don't discount the possibility of
Dallas Keuchel returning -- but the lineup is imposing, and the additions
of Michael
Brantley and top prospect Kyle Tucker make
it even better.
8. BOSTON RED
SOX
I rate the Red Sox behind the Yankees and Astros for a few
reasons: Boston's bullpen isn't as good; there are some concerns over Chris Sale's
shoulder; the possibility of a World Series hangover; and a weak minor league
system. Still, if Mookie Betts and J.D. Martinez hit
close to their 2018 levels, you can print playoff tickets.
7. LOS ANGELES
DODGERS
There is a strong case that the Dodgers are the best bet to
return to the playoffs. After all, they've won all those NL West titles in a
row, they're still loaded with more rotation depth than any other team, they
added Pollock and they have Corey Seager returning.
Plus, the division looks weak, as the Giants and San Diego
Padres have been quiet so far, and the Arizona
Diamondbacks lost their two best players in Paul
Goldschmidt (trade) and Patrick
Corbin (free agency), along with Pollock. The non-playoff
scenario features a strong season from the Colorado
Rockies, a couple of major injuries and a tight wild-card race that
results in the Dodgers falling short.
6. CLEVELAND
INDIANS
Maybe the most frustrating comment from a front-office
executive this offseason came over the weekend from Minnesota
Twins general manager Thad Levine at the team's TwinsFest.
Asked about Manny Machado and Bryce Harper, Levine answered: "My view ...
for doing it is the best time to acquire players of that magnitude is when your
window to win is wide-open. Not when you've got your fingers underneath the
window and you're trying to jam the window open. I want to do it when we're
projected to win the Central and we're ready to put our foot on someone's
throat."
So, don't sign a star ... unless you're already expected to
win the division?
Not that Machado and Harper want to sign with the Twins, but
no team could benefit from adding a player of that magnitude more than the
Twins, who are trying to chase down Cleveland. The extra wins a player such as
Machado or Harper could provide might be the difference between first place and
second place -- not to mention that they could add that foot to the throat for
future seasons.
The Indians are somewhat vulnerable, with a weak outfield, a
weak bullpen and not much offense after Jose Ramirez and Francisco
Lindor; if they suffer a major injury in the rotation, they're even
more susceptible. The Twins have some strong rebound candidates, and the other
three teams in the division are bad. Minnesota did add Nelson Cruz and Jonathan
Schoop, but imagine Machado or Harper anchoring its lineup.
5. CHICAGO CUBS
The Cubs are good. A lot went wrong in 2018 and they still
won 95 games. There are concerns with the rotation (Jon Lester and Cole Hamels are
both 35, Yu Darvish is
coming off an injury, Tyler
Chatwood is coming off a 5.30 ERA), but the main thing that
could get in their way is a strong division. The St. Louis
Cardinals look tougher with Goldschmidt, and the Reds should be
better. The NL Central teams could beat each other up to the point that only
the division winner makes the playoffs.
4. MILWAUKEE
BREWERS
NL Central current projections as I see it
CUBS: 87-75
CARDINALS: 86-76
PIRATES: 85-75
REDS: 81-81
BREWERS: 79-83
So, that's interesting. I think the Brewers are better than
that and the projections are likely underestimating their bullpen and defense.
I also like what Corbin Burnes and/or Brandon
Woodruff could do in the rotation. Still, it's a tough division
and some players might not repeat their 2018 performances, making the Brewers a
regression candidate.
3. ATLANTA
BRAVES
The Braves added Josh
Donaldson, but the Mets and Washington
Nationals also have made significant additions, and the Philadelphia
Phillies could still land Machado or Harper on top of Andrew
McCutchen and David
Robertson. The Braves also lost Anibal
Sanchez (2.83 ERA in 24 starts), and we'll see if Mike
Foltynewicz can repeat his BABIP-heavy 2.85 ERA. Basically, it
looks like a four-way slugfest in the NL East, which makes the Braves
vulnerable.
2. OAKLAND
ATHLETICS
The biggest advantage the A's have for a return to the
playoffs is a lack of competition. The Tampa Bay
Rays should be playoff contenders after winning 90 games, and
maybe the Twins step up. But the Mariners won’t be as good, and the Los Angeles
Angels made just minor additions to an 80-win team. The A's
just signed Marco Estrada,
and rookie Jesus Luzardo could make an impact; however, the rotation looks
shaky, the bullpen will probably regress and you have to figure one of the
Rays, Twins or Angels will put it together. That could block the A's from a
wild card.
1. COLORADO
ROCKIES
The Rockies hold the same advantage that the Dodgers have of
playing in a weak division, but all Colorado has done is add Daniel Murphy (while
losing DJ LeMahieu).
The Rockies' rotation was outstanding in 2018 -- and also healthy, with four
starters making 31 or more starts. That's unlikely to happen again, and not
just because of altitude. Mostly though, the Rockies will simply face tougher
competition across the league. With the Dodgers rating as heavy favorites in
the division, the Rockies are thrown into that crowded wild-card free-for-all.
No comments:
Post a Comment