While these rankings are ultimately subjective -- this is,
after all, my opinion of each system's relative merits -- I base them on as
broad a collection of information as I can. I've seen many of these prospects,
I've talked to many scouts and executives about prospects, and I've talked to
team officials about their own systems.
Within each system, I'll rank at least 10 prospects, but
these rankings consider everything in each system. Most teams have more than 10
players within their minor leagues who project to be better than
replacement-level big leaguers, and all of those guys count. Players who have
lost Rookie of the Year eligibility (more than 130 at-bats, 50 innings or 45
days on the active 25-man roster) do not count toward these rankings.
I'd rather have potential stars, even if there's some risk
involved, but there's also real value in being able to provide your own fifth
starters or utility players without having to pay for them on the open market.
That means some teams here toward the top of the list got "credit"
for 20 or more players in their systems, whereas those in the bottom third top
out around 15 names.
I do favor prospects with higher upsides (or
"ceilings") over those with less potential to become stars but higher
probability of reaching the majors in some role. Few clubs are able to afford
stars on the open market, so developing your own is critical for half or even
two-thirds of the franchises in baseball. And if you have a prospect who
projects as a star, you have the currency to acquire almost any major leaguer
you want. The teams in the top 10 have potential stars and a lot of second-tier
prospects with future big league value, while the teams in the bottom 10 don't
have much of either, with two clubs lacking any top-100 prospects at all.
I'm most surprised by how unbalanced the farm systems across
the game are right now. The top four were easy for me to choose, and the bottom
six were too, but there are gulfs between them. To some extent, this is a
natural outcome of the process of building a good system, contending, and then
graduating or trading off your best prospects to enhance or extend your window
of success.
We're also seeing more teams concentrate wholeheartedly on
their farm systems, however, to the detriment of the big league club -- it's
not "tanking" the way it exists in the NBA, but it is the baseball
equivalent. A strong farm system is good only to the extent that it leads to
major league wins.
1. San Diego
Padres
2018 rank: 3
2018 rank: 3
The Padres are poised to sit at or near the top of these
rankings for quite some time, even though they'll likely lose at least three
top-100 prospects to graduations this year (Fernando Tatis Jr., Chris
Paddack, Luis Urias and
maybe Logan Allen), with the 2016 international class still just barely getting
to full-season ball, another solid draft class last year and the sixth overall
pick this year. The system remains deep in shortstops and power arms, with guys
like Luis PatiƱo emerging from nowhere -- he's gained about 12 mph in two years
-- while many of those 2016 signees haven't even begun to fill out physically.
The Padres are going to start winning more games in 2019 and especially 2020,
so there will soon come a point where all this prospect depth could fuel major
league trades rather than boosting their farm system rankings.
2. Tampa Bay
Rays
2018 rank: 7
2018 rank: 7
This happened rather quickly, so much so that the Rays were
even able to trade away some prospect depth (including Brock Burke) this
offseason and could continue to do so as they try to compete in the AL East
this year. Wander Franco went from interesting July 2 signee to No. 3 overall
prospect in the game; they took the third-best player on my board (Matthew
Liberatore) with the 16th overall pick last June; they traded Chris Archer and
picked up a top-100 prospect in Shane Baz; and they've continued to add
under-the-radar talent in smaller deals. This ranking even comes in spite of a
terrible year for the Rays on the player health front, with Brent
Honeywell, Jose De Leon, Anthony Banda,
Drew Strotman and Austin Franklin all undergoing Tommy John surgery while
former first-rounder Garrett Whitley dislocated his shoulder and missed the
entire season.
3. Atlanta
Braves
2018 rank: 1
2018 rank: 1
The pitching depth acquired under former GM John Coppolella
reached the majors last year, and there's still another tier to come with the
return of Patrick Weigel and slower but steady progress from their first three
picks in the 2016 draft class. The system's overall depth has started to thin
out with minor trades and promotions, but it should be productive for several
more years, boosted this year by the compensation pick (ninth overall) the team
received for failing to come to terms with its 2018 first-rounder, Carter
Stewart.
4. Minnesota
Twins
2018 rank: 10
2018 rank: 10
A sneaky-good system, one that I think is underrated within
the industry. The Twins have two elite prospects at the top (Royce Lewis and
Alex Kirilloff) whom everybody knows, then two arms below that, one of whom
(Brusdar Graterol) is well-known and one of whom (Jordan Balazovic) isn't, and
beyond that they have a parade of unfamous names who project to at least some
tangible big league value. Their greatest depth is in power arms -- yes, the
Twins now have guys who throw hard -- and outfielders, while they're weaker on
the infield and have very little catching.
5. Los Angeles
Dodgers
2018 rank: 9
2018 rank: 9
The Dodgers just boosted their system in the trade that
sent Alex Wood, Yasiel Puig and Matt Kemp's
contract to the Reds, bringing back two prospects who were high draft picks in
the past two years and have performed well since signing, adding to a system
that saw upticks from several prospects already in-house, including Will Smith
and Tony Gonsolin. They didn't sign first-rounder J.T. Ginn, but may have
unearthed gems in a couple of later rounds who will make up for what they lost.
6. Cincinnati
Reds
2018 rank: 6
2018 rank: 6
This could change, as the Reds already have dealt two
prospects from their top 10 in the big Dodgers deal and a prospect from their
top 20-25 in the Sonny Gray deal,
and I've heard they've made other prospects beyond their top three available,
including 2018 first-rounder Jonathan India. But for now, the Reds are in good
shape, thanks to years of productive drafts that have given them a strong
cluster of prospects who look like they'll hit the majors in the next two
years, along with long-term high-upside play Hunter Greene.
7. Los Angeles
Angels
2018 rank: 19
2018 rank: 19
Remember when the Angels had the worst farm system? They've
come a long way in a fairly short period of time under GM Billy Eppler, and
have been more productive in the draft, on the international front and in
trades, landing one of their top 10 prospects in a minor deal for CJ Cron.
There's depth in lesser-known names here, especially international signings
from Latin America and the Bahamas, where they've been much more aggressive in
the past three years.
8. Arizona
Diamondbacks
2018 rank: 26
2018 rank: 26
Another system that has bounced back quickly after bottoming
out a few years ago, the Diamondbacks have rebuilt with two very strong drafts
(despite whiffing twice on first-rounders), a couple of productive trades and
the signings of the two best Bahamian prospects in baseball. The news gets even
better: In this June's draft, Arizona will pick 16th, 26th, twice in the comp A
round, once in the second round and twice more in the competitive balance B
round, giving it seven picks in the top 80.
9. Toronto Blue
Jays
2018 rank: 17
2018 rank: 17
The Jays' system is topped with two elite prospects and
might have a third depending on how 2019 plays out for Nate Pearson, whose 2018
was ruined by freak injuries. But after about a half-dozen names, it drops off
very quickly, boosted by some college draftees who have been old for their
levels. The Jays also have an intriguing group of teenage prospects who spent
last year in short-season leagues, along with their 2018 first-rounder Jordan
Groshans, who could help the team stay in this range on the rankings even after
it loses Vlad Guerrero Jr. and possibly Bo Bichette to the majors.
10. Philadelphia
Phillies
2018 rank: 5
2018 rank: 5
The Phillies' system had a down year by all accounts, with
many of their most vaunted players coming into 2018 struggling with performance
and/or injuries, and both scouts and execs reporting back that the Phillies'
biggest names had lost value in their eyes. They had two big breakouts from
Spencer Howard and Luis Garcia (the
shortstop), but their track record of poor results on high first-round
selections -- they've hit on just one first-round pick, Aaron Nola,
since taking Cole Hamels in
2002 -- has absolutely hurt their system's value as a whole.
11. Cleveland
Indians
2018 rank: 16
2018 rank: 16
The most underrated system in baseball? Cleveland's Arizona
League team had an embarrassment of prospect riches, even after the Indians
traded Jhon Torres to St. Louis in the deal for Oscar Mercado (also a solid
prospect). They had five of the 20 names on my friend Bill Mitchell's list for
Baseball America of the top prospects in the AZL, and a sixth, right-hander
Lenny Torres, didn't play enough to qualify. And that's before I mention the
two elite prospects atop the system and the couple of mid-tier position players
who established greater value for themselves last year. If Cleveland does
trade Corey Kluber or Trevor Bauer for
a huge haul, it could end up with a top-tier system, but the Indians also have
the prospect capital to use to trade and get another player (an outfielder?) to
help them contend again in 2019.
12. Houston
Astros
2018 rank: 13
2018 rank: 13
It feels like this system should be worse, given all the
trades the Astros have made and their drop to drafting at the end of each round
rather than the top, yet they're still here, and they even added a few
prospects to their top 20 in a recent trade with the Mets for players they
didn't need. The system has thinned out beyond the top 10-12 prospects compared
with where it was three years ago, but the major league core is still young and
the gap before the next wave of prospects arrives after Forrest Whitley
and Kyle Tucker shouldn't
affect the big league club too much.
13. Chicago White
Sox
2018 rank: 4
2018 rank: 4
Still the most top-heavy system among the top half of
organizations, although a couple of years of college-oriented drafts have
provided depth in players who should at least be big leaguers, albeit with
limited ceilings. The emergence this year of Micker Adolfo, who had the best
year of his career before the White Sox shut him down to get his elbow fixed,
was the nicest surprise, but the system could still use more starters who
project as more than No. 5s. I found it harder to get to 20 names I felt strongly
about than I do for most systems above the median.
14. New York Mets
2018 rank: 21
2018 rank: 21
The Mets would easily have had a top-10 system had they not
traded away their top two prospects, Jarred Kelenic and Justin Dunn, as well as
other valuable prospects such as Luis Santana, in a bid to make the 2019 team a
contender -- a bid that might very well work if their starters are healthy
enough, but that could just as easily lead to a fourth-place finish. Despite
the trades, it's still no worse than an average system thanks to a lot of hits
on draft picks beyond the first round and some successes in the international
market over the past two years.
15. Pittsburgh
Pirates
2018 rank: 15
2018 rank: 15
The Pirates seem to have a lot of underperformers in their
system, players who would grade out well on tools but haven't converted them
into production, especially when it comes to position players who show power
but don't hit for power in games. That also means there's a lot of untapped
potential here that could emerge in the future, or perhaps after a trade. Or
maybe I'm just being obstinate about players I like.
16. Colorado
Rockies
2018 rank: 11
2018 rank: 11
The Rockies surprised me as I started to compare their
system to others in this range to try to slot them, as I would have guessed
they'd be in or closer to the top 10, but they've received virtually nothing
out of Latin America in the past five years, so even some strong draft classes
(notably 2018, which looks very promising right now) couldn't keep them above
the median.
17. St. Louis
Cardinals
2018 rank: 12
2018 rank: 12
The Cardinals' system took a hit with the trade for Paul
Goldschmidt and some brutal years for top prospects -- Alex Reyes got
hurt yet again, first-rounder Delvin Perez looks like a nonprospect -- as well
as a few graduations. But they also restocked a little with the trades of Tommy Pham and
Oscar Mercado, so there's still some depth here in outfielders and back-end
pitching.
18. Detroit
Tigers
2018 rank: 20
2018 rank: 20
Getting better but not there yet, the Tigers have been hurt
a bit more than most rebuilding teams by the lack of tradable assets (speaking
of contracts rather than just players) on the major league club, although Nick
Castellanos and a healthy Michael
Fulmer could help them make another leap. They picked first
last year and landed the best player in the draft class, Casey Mize, but then
chose to put most of their remaining bonus pool in two high-risk prep hitters
with question marks, which could work out spectacularly but carries a high
probability of zero return.
19. New York
Yankees
2018 rank: 2
2018 rank: 2
The Yankees' top end has thinned out significantly, but from
low-A down they at least have a strong collection of guys who show enough to
grab your attention -- elite speed or power, big velocity, huge spin rates --
and create some potential trade value. Other than their top prospect, Deivi
Garcia, however, just about all of their starter prospects were either hurt
last year or struggled to throw strikes, and three of their best position
player prospects had injury troubles too.
20. Texas Rangers
2018 rank: 22
2018 rank: 22
The Rangers lack much in the way of near-term help in the
system, but from high-A down they had a lot of high-upside prospects who
haven't quite clicked yet or who still have some remaining questions around
their ultimate ceilings. They're still one of the most high school-focused
teams in the draft, although their recent drafts have shifted toward picks with
more polish rather than just grabbing the best athletes and hoping for the
best, with Cole Ragans and Cole Winn two great, recent examples of their new
philosophy.
21. Kansas City
Royals
2018 rank: 27
2018 rank: 27
The Royals' farm system is last year's low-A Lexington
lineup plus their 2018 draft class and Khalil Lee. They won't have as many
picks this June, since they had extra selections for losing free agents last
year, but their draft strategy seemed like a change in direction and the early
results have been very promising, including lefty Daniel Lynch, taken 34th
overall but probably a top-10 pick if we redid the draft today. The flaw here
is how little there is from their draft classes prior to 2017, when they bet
big on some high school arms who haven't panned out at all.
22. Seattle
Mariners
2018 rank: 30
2018 rank: 30
They're not the worst! They're not even second-worst! The
Mariners kept trading prospect after prospect until this winter's 180-degree
turn that saw them ship out James Paxton, Edwin Diaz and
the bad half of Robinson Cano's
contract for prospects, giving them more top-100 prospects this winter than
they have had in the past three winters combined.
23. Washington
Nationals
2018 rank: 18
2018 rank: 18
Team president/GM Mike Rizzo usually identifies two or three
prospects at the top of the system he won't trade and then makes everyone else
available, so their system is, once again, strong at the top and lacks much
depth anywhere on the field. They have some promising Latin American prospects
who just started to see full-season ball and took a few gambles in last year's
draft that don't have much value right now but will have huge payoffs if they
hit, especially pitchers Reid Schaller and Chandler Day.
24. Boston Red
Sox
2018 rank: 24
2018 rank: 24
The Red Sox's system had a brutal 2018, with Jay Groome
going down with Tommy John surgery, Michael Chavis suspended 80 games for a
positive drug test, Alex Scherff missing time with an oblique strain, and more
injuries to top guys, while several years of drafting near the end of the first
round also caught up to them. Their 2017-18 draft and international classes
look strong, however, giving the system more breakout candidates than most orgs
down here in the 20s have.
25. Milwaukee
Brewers
2018 rank: 8
2018 rank: 8
The Brewers traded away several prospects to boost the major
league roster in the past 13 months and promoted several more, which got them
within a game of the World Series. As much as some fans like to dismiss
prospects as "just prospects" or some sort of unknown quantity, a
strong farm system has real value, and the Brewers used their farm system last
year in the two best ways you can. The result, of course, is a system that's as
thin as it's been in several years, with a few former top prospects still here
but losing value quickly due to nonperformance.
26. San Francisco
Giants
2018 rank: 29
2018 rank: 29
The Giants' system had been trending down for years and
finally bottomed out last season, with almost every significant prospect
already in the system taking a step back. There is some hope here that their
big international class from 2018 can boost the system over the next few
summers, and the Giants had the second overall pick last year, Joey Bart, whom
they appear to have valued more highly than I did.
27. Oakland
Athletics
2018 rank: 14
2018 rank: 14
They might be a spot higher if I were confident Kyler Murray
planned to play baseball, but he's not their No. 1 prospect anyway and for all
the talk about his decision, he is a long way from the majors. Their bigger
concern has to be the nonperformance of so many important position-player
prospects last year -- their top two picks from 2017, the two main hitting
prospects they acquired in trades that same summer -- and the injuries to
nearly all of their top pitching prospects, with two of them, Daulton Jefferies
and James Kaprielian, struggling to get back to full strength after Tommy John
surgeries.
28. Miami Marlins
2018 rank: 28
2018 rank: 28
The Marlins traded away several high-value major leaguers
and got relatively little to show for it on the prospect side, so their system
remains thin, exacerbated by a rash of injuries to first-round picks. They did
splurge on Cuban outfielder Victor Mesa, whose ceiling is very much up for
debate if you ask scouts, and their new player development and scouting staffs
are going to focus more on the kinds of players and development techniques that
helped the Yankees build a strong farm system over the past five years.
29. Chicago Cubs
2018 rank: 25
2018 rank: 25
The Cubs' fall from farm system grace has been abrupt, sped
by graduations and the trades of two elite prospects (Gleyber
Torres and Eloy Jimenez) for pitching help, as well as worse
results in the drafts since they began picking toward the end of the first
round. There may not be a starting pitching prospect in the system who projects
as more than a No. 5 starter, and without last year's draft class there's only
one position player prospect who projects as a regular.
30. Baltimore
Orioles
2018 rank: 23
2018 rank: 23
The O's pick first in this year's draft and they need it, as
the system has fallen apart, which is how they ended up with the worst record
in baseball and in need of a change to their entire baseball ops department.
The failure to sign international free agents before this year was a huge part
of it, dictated by ownership, but the Orioles also have been unable to develop
talented players brought into the system from the draft or trades. Their
pitchers have gotten hurt or failed to develop with alarming frequency, and
even performing players such as Austin Hays and
Ryan McKenna were rewarded with unwarranted swing changes. The system is a
mess, and it will take years to overhaul it. Fortunately the Orioles hired the
right people for the job.
No comments:
Post a Comment