The NFL's final four looked exciting on paper and delivered in real life on
Sunday. It was the first time in NFL history both conference championship games
went to overtime, which was almost an afterthought given how much these two
games crammed into regulation. The Patriots and
Chiefs had four lead changes in a 38-point fourth quarter.
The Rams battled back to tie the Saints twice and didn't lead
until Greg Zuerlein hit
a 57-yarder to win the game in the extra period.
There's a lot to get to in discussing
these games. There are moments you've forgotten in light of what happened
afterward, and I say that because I forgot them before I
started looking through my notes, too.
Let's run through 16 key moments from Sunday's games and try
to get a sense of what actually happened during a furious day of football:
THE NO-CALL
ON NICKELL
ROBEY-COLEMAN
SITUATION: third-and-10 on the Rams' 13, 1:49
left in the fourth quarter
SCORE: tied 20-20
I have to start with the most agonizingly frustrating moment
of the day. You've probably seen the play by now. I
don't need to tell you that it was pass interference. It's an absolutely brutal
missed call from a crew that seemed allergic to making big calls. The refs
already had missed a would-be pass interference call on Robey-Coleman on a
prior third-and-7 against Jr. that would have extended a Saints drive on
Los Angeles' side of the field in the fourth quarter.
When we see key pass interference calls, the usual
conversation is about how we need to fix the pass interference rule itself.
That's not the case here. The rule was fine, but it simply wasn't applied
properly. ESPN's Kevin Seifert wrote that pass interference should become a reviewable call,
and I wouldn't be opposed to that idea. By all rights, the Saints should have
been given the ball in a first-and-goal situation, where they could have
drained the clock and kicked a field goal to take the lead with about 12
seconds left on the clock. Instead, well, you saw what happened.
Did the no-call cost the Saints the game? In the context of
that one play, yes. In the broader context of that drive and what happened
next, though, I think the Saints didn't do themselves any favors. After Drew Brees lofted
up a prayer to Ginn for a 43-yard gain over Lamarcus
Joyner to get the Saints into the red zone, they stood over the
ball with 1:58 left to go on the Los Angeles 13-yard line and the Rams holding
two timeouts. Had they run the ball three times without gaining a first down,
the Saints would have attempted a gimme field goal with about one minute to go.
The Rams would have needed to drive into field goal range without any timeouts.
Instead, the Saints threw the ball twice, as the third-down
pass to Lewis was preceded by a first-down slant to Michael
Thomas on a pick play New Orleans loves to run. It's a mildly
contrarian call from Sean Payton in a moment in which everyone is typically
expecting a run, given that it has a high chance of being completed while
keeping the clock running. Brees missed the throw, putting the ball too low. I
understand the playcall, and in most cases, I love when coaches are aggressive.
I'm not as sure about this one. Brees should have been bailed out by the pass
interference call, but when he wasn't, the Saints left the door wide-open for
the Rams to come back.
CLARK BREAKS DOWN
CONTROVERSIAL NO-CALL
Ryan Clark analyzes the lack of a pass interference call
late in the game between the Rams and the Saints.
That's exactly what happened, and while the pass
interference non-call was awful and the decision to throw on first down was at
least defensible, the Saints didn't get the job done after the field goal. They
let Jared Goff drive
45 yards downfield in less than a minute. If anything, they were lucky to get
to overtime, given that the Saints badly blew a coverage against a stacked set
of receivers and allowed Goff to hit a wide-open Robert Woods,
who stumbled and was limited to 16 yards. Had Woods been upright and caught the
ball without breaking stride, he might have scored a touchdown.
In overtime, the Saints even won the coin toss and got the
ball first, only to seem shell-shocked. They moved the ball with a pass
interference call, but Mark Ingram was
spun backward for a loss of 6 yards before Brees was hit in the middle of his
motion and picked off by John Johnson III. The Rams then converted two passes to Tyler Higbee before
Woods dropped a screen and Zuerlein hit a 57-yard field goal to send the Rams
to the Super Bowl. As bad as the non-call against Robey-Coleman was, the Saints
were still favorites to win after kicking the field goal in regulation and
winning the coin toss in overtime. They weren't able to finish the job in
either situation.
THE RAMS
SUCCESSFULLY EXECUTE A FAKE PUNT
SITUATION: Fourth-and-5 on the Rams' 30-yard
line, 14:23 left in the second quarter
SCORE: Saints lead 13-0
For the second week in a row, a team in the Superdome was
able to spark its offense and extend a possession with a desperate fake punt in
the first half. Last week, it was the Saints. This time, the fake punt went
against the Saints, as Johnny Hekker hit Sam Shields with
a 12-yard pass for Los Angeles' initial first-down conversion of the day. The
Rams eventually drove into the red zone and hit a field goal for their first
points of the game.
Last week, after Doug Pederson turned down that third-down
penalty to take a fourth-and-1, there was a public inquest into his
decision-making. Didn't he know Payton loves to take chances? I'm not sure I
have a strong opinion on that call either way, but if anyone should have
realized that the Rams were inclined to call for a fake in a similar situation,
shouldn't it have been Payton and his staff after doing the exact same thing a
week earlier? Under the tutelage of John Fassel, Hekker has been one of the
most aggressive and effective passers in the league. The Saints weren't
prepared, though, and while it required Shields to make Justin Hardee miss
in the open field, Hekker had a relatively easy completion to the former Packers cornerback.
THE SAINTS KICK
THEIR SECOND FIELD GOAL IN THE RED ZONE
SITUATION: Fourth-and-4 on the Rams' 10-yard
line, 7:10 to go in the first quarter
SCORE: Saints go up 6-0
The Saints probably should have been able to win Sunday's
game before things ever came down to a missed call in the fourth quarter, but
they were profligate in the red zone in the first quarter. After driving to the
Rams' 19-yard line on their opening possession, the Saints called timeout
before a third-and-7 snap. After the timeout, the Saints ran with three
vertical routes and two underneath routes to Michael
Thomas and Alvin Kamara.
Brees decided to take a shot to backup tight end Dan Arnold,
which seemed curious given that a throw to Arnold would draw double coverage
while Brees had single matchups on the outside. The throw hit Arnold in the
hands, but he dropped it and the Saints kicked a field goal.
After Todd Gurley dropped a pass into a Demario Davis interception,
the Saints took over for their second possession with the ball already in the
red zone. They didn't do much. They ran two plays for one yard, then a quick
throw to Alvin Kamara only gained five, and the Saints kicked a field goal from
the 10-yard line to go up 6-0. Would they have gone for it on fourth-and-2 or
less? Maybe. While they came away with three points, the two early drives ended
up seeming reminiscent of the 2014 NFC Championship Game, when Mike McCarthy kicked two field goals inside 20 yards in the first
half to go up 6-0. Payton faced a fourth-and-7 and a fourth-and-4,
so I can't fault him in the same way for kicking, but the Saints didn't do
enough to take advantage of their dominant play early in the game.
Later on, the Saints ended up stalling at midfield. The
first missed pass interference call on Robey-Coleman forced them to punt on
fourth-and-7 from the Rams' 47-yard line. On their next drive, after a hold
on Terron
Armstead, they punted on fourth-and-17 from their own 47-yard line.
Last week, the Saints were able to pull out second- or third-and-long
opportunities with throws to Michael Thomas. This week, Brees actually had Ginn
open to convert on third-and-17, but badly missed the throw and nearly had his
pass intercepted by Robey-Coleman. If the Saints turn one of those early field
goals into touchdowns or turn one of those drives at midfield into a field
goal, they probably win this game.
SEAN MCVAY KICKS A
FIELD GOAL TO TIE THE SCORE
SITUATION: Fourth-and-goal from the Saints'
1-yard line, 5:16 to go
SCORE: Rams tie the score at 20-20
This, on the other hand, was an inexcusably bad decision
from the game's most promising young coach. The next time the Rams spend the
entire week talking about how they're a physical football team built around
running the football, as they did after beating the Cowboys last week, you can
safely ignore that as bluster. Last week, on fourth-and-goal from the 1-yard
line up eight points, the Rams inexplicably tried to draw the Cowboys offside
and called a timeout before going for it and scoring a touchdown.
On Sunday, in a situation in which the math heavily favors
going for it, McVay didn't trust his team to get a yard. As Seth Walder noted,
the Rams dropped their chances of winning from 55 percent to 43 percent by
choosing to attempt a field goal. They should have attempted to go for it if
they thought they had merely a 32 percent chance of converting from a yard out,
which shouldn't be difficult given that Los Angeles converted in
68 percent of power situations this season.
Is McVay winning the game proof that he made the right call?
Absolutely not. To win this game, the Rams eventually needed to be bailed out
by the awful missed pass interference call against Robey-Coleman, drive
downfield to hit a game-tying field goal, stop the Saints on the first drive of
overtime, and then hit a 57-yard field goal to win it. If they had scored a
touchdown on that fourth-and-goal play -- and the odds were in their favor --
the Rams could have essentially won the game by stopping the Saints on a
fourth-and-8 after the Robey-Coleman non-call.
McVay's timeout management and fourth-down decision-making
has been a weakness for the Rams, and while they've advanced to the Super Bowl,
he's going to be at a considerable disadvantage across the field from
Belichick, who manages in-game situations about as well as anybody in football.
McVay is an excellent coach, and obviously gets a lot of things right. He'll
get better at managing games with experience. That experience might not help
two weeks from now.
Gurley spends the third quarter stretching on the
sideline
Score: Saints lead 20-17 entering the fourth
quarter
It was a bizarre game for the Rams' star running back, who
spent a second consecutive week serving as what amounted to a secondary back
behind C.J. Anderson.
A lesser back might have been benched for Gurley's first half, where he dropped
one pass into Davis's lap for an interception and whiffed on a pass block
against Eli Apple.
Gurley ran the ball in at the end of that subsequent drive for a 6-yard
touchdown, but despite the score line, the Rams stuck with Anderson as their lead
back.
The two backs split snaps, with Anderson getting 35 to
Gurley's 32, but the former Broncos standout racked up 17 touches to Gurley's
five. Gurley swore after the game that he was simply
"sorry" and not injured, but it's hard to believe that the
Rams have suddenly decided that a guy they signed off the street in December is
worth playing ahead of a back who was taking 90-plus percent of the snaps when
healthy. He finished the night posting a
Photoshop depicting himself exchanging jerseys with referee Bill Vinovich,
which will likely earn him some sort of fine from the NFL.
GURLEY GETS
EMOTIONAL AFTER NFC CHAMPIONSHIP GAME WIN
Todd Gurley II tears up after the Rams beat the Saints to
earn a spot in Super Bowl LIII.
Gurley's situation is going to be fascinating to figure out
over the next two weeks. In a vacuum, the default game plan for the Patriots
against the Rams in the Super Bowl would be to emulate Belichick's famous
scheme against Marshall Faulk by hitting Gurley as often as possible and taking
him out of the game. If Gurley is injured, though, should the Patriots be as
concerned about stopping him? Can he get closer to 100 percent with two weeks
of rest? Are the Rams better off going with Anderson as their primary back? And
if that's true, what does it say about the decision to pay Gurley a premium
based on how he performed last season?
GOFF THROWS A SWING
PASS TO BRANDIN COOKS FOR
25 YARDS
The Rams' turnaround has come ahead of schedule thanks to
the environment built by their 32-year-old coach who has become a standard
other teams wish to copy.
Score: Saints lead 20-10
While the Rams have used play-action and motion across the
formation to open up the defense for YAC opportunities for two years running,
what made this swing pass to Cooks so interesting is the formation. This was one
of 16 plays the Rams ran out of 12 personnel (one back, two tight ends), which
pushed both Gerald
Everett and Tyler Higbee onto
the field at the same time. The Rams ran more than 31 percent of their
offensive snaps out of 12 personnel, which was a marked change for a team that
used 11 personnel (one back, one tight end) more than 91 percent of the time
during the regular season, per the NFL's Next Gen Stats.
It's one thing to play off your tendencies
and try something different in the postseason, but it's another to do it
successfully. The Rams posted a 75 percent success rate out of 12 personnel on
Sunday against just a 43 percent success rate out of their traditional 11
personnel. It's one thing to stick with 11 personnel when you have Cooper Kupp on
the field, but with Kupp gone, the Rams might be better off with two tight ends
on the field as opposed to Josh Reynolds,
at least some of the time. It's something that will give the Patriots pause as
they devise a game plan for the Super Bowl.
TOM BRADY HITS ROB
GRONKOWSKI FOR A 25-YARD COMPLETION
SITUATION: Third-and-5 on the Chiefs' 29-yard
line, 54 seconds left in regulation
SCORE: Chiefs lead 28-24
In key moments, Brady is generally looking for one of two
guys: Julian
Edelman or Gronk, who was the target on a number of critical third
downs late in this game. This play came after Brady attempted to go to
Gronkowski on a third-and-10 pass that was intercepted before being brought
back on an offsides call (more on that in a minute). The Patriots needed five
yards in two plays and had all their timeouts, so it might have been reasonable
to expect just about anything out of the Pats' playbook.
Most teams would have tried to move the chains with a
high-percentage pass. Instead, Brady trusted his Hall of Fame tight end to make
a play. The Patriots split out Gronkowski and saw that he was matched up
against star Chiefs defensive back Eric Berry with
a single-high safety in the middle of the field. Brady took his chances and
threw a fade to Gronkowski, who outmuscled Berry at the line and brought in the football.
It was no surprise, given that Brady went to Gronkowski for
two critical fourth-quarter catches in the regular-season matchup between these
two teams, including a 39-yard reception on the final drive over Josh Shaw,
who hadn't played on defense all season and has since been cut. The Chiefs
didn't have Berry in that game, and it's unlikely that he's 100 percent, but
they couldn't make the same excuse about a mismatch this time. In overtime,
Brady moved the chains on a third-and-10 with a slant to Gronk against Berry to
get the Patriots in the red zone. Three Rex Burkhead runs
later, the Patriots were in the Super Bowl.
As for that offsides call, there was chatter on Twitter
afterward that the call was unjust, given that Dee Ford was
whistled for a neutral-zone infraction but drawn deeper into the line by left
tackle Trent Brown,
who wasn't on the line of scrimmage. That might very well be true, but it
wouldn't have given the Chiefs their game-sealing interception back. Ford was offsides,
and if Brown had been whistled for an illegal formation, the penalties would
have offset and the Pats would have replayed third down. The Pats were
incorrectly spotted five yards, but given that they threw a pass 20-plus yards
downfield to Gronk on the ensuing third-and-5, I don't think it materially
impacted the game.
CHRIS JONES IS
CALLED FOR A PHANTOM ROUGHING THE PASSER PENALTY
SITUATION: Second-and-7 on the New England
28-yard line, 7:10 to go in the fourth quarter
SCORE: Chiefs lead 21-17
Well, this is awkward. Earlier this week, I wrote about how there
isn't much evidence of Tom Brady getting
a disproportionate number of roughing the passer calls. So,
several days later, Brady ... gets a shaky roughing the passer call when the
Chiefs defensive lineman appeared to hit Brady in the shoulder, only to be
called for a blow to the head. Thanks, refs.
It was a terrible call. I'd also point out that it's the
fourth time Brady has benefited from a roughing the passer call in 1,002
postseason dropbacks since returning from his torn ACL in 2009, which is one
penalty for every 250.5 dropbacks. Teams like the Cardinals and Vikings have
benefited from roughing the passer penalties more frequently over that same
time frame, and the mark is right in line with the Pats' regular-season average
since 2009 (224.5 dropbacks per roughing the passer call). It was a bad call,
but it's also not representative of special treatment for Brady in the
postseason, as much as that one play might suggest otherwise.
I'm bringing this one up more to talk about the absence of
the Chiefs' pass rush, which ended up dooming their chances on Sunday night.
Facing a front four that sacked opposing quarterbacks 41 times this season,
Brady dropped back 48 times and wasn't sacked even once. He was only knocked
down on one occasion and pressured on 10.9 percent of those pass plays, the
lowest rate for any passer against the Chiefs this season. Brady helped by
getting his passes out after an average of 2.51 seconds, the second-fastest
rate against Kansas City this season. Jones played through a second-half
injury, while the likes of Ford and Justin
Houston simply didn't make their mark in the most important
game the Chiefs have played in decades. It might very well have been Houston's
final game in a Chiefs uniform.
BRADY GETS
QUESTIONABLE ROUGHING THE PASSER CALL
The refs whistle Chiefs DE Chris Jones for a roughing the
passer call. The Patriots would later score on the drive.
The reality is that the Chiefs were gassed. With the
Patriots dominating time of possession in the first half and holding the ball
in overtime, they finished the game with 94 offensive plays to Kansas City's
47. As Chase Stuart pointed out
on Twitter, this is reminiscent of the comeback victory over the
Falcons in the Super Bowl, when the Patriots ran 93 plays to Atlanta's 47. As I
noted at the time, the Falcons' pass rush was useful for most of the game before
simply falling apart late in the contest. Here, while the Chiefs didn't do much
with their rush for most of the game, they offered even less on the final few
drives.
THE PATRIOTS WIN
THE OVERTIME COIN TOSS
SITUATION: Beginning of overtime
SCORE: Tied at 31-31
After Patrick
Mahomes drove the Chiefs 48 yards on two plays to get into
field goal range at the end of regulation, Andy Reid called for Mahomes to
throw one pass downfield before Harrison
Butker tied the game up with a 39-yard field goal. Mahomes
never saw the field again, as the Patriots won the coin toss and then drove 75
yards for the game-winning touchdown. It was a cruel end to the season for the
presumptive league MVP.
If you're a Chiefs fan, you're probably complaining about
the league's overtime system this morning. I don't know that I agree. The
Chiefs didn't manage to come up with a single stop in overtime, allowing the
Pats to convert third-and-10 three different times. That's on Bob Sutton and
the defense, not the coin toss. I think the old system of allowing teams to win
on a field goal was probably too easy in a league with professional kickers,
which is why I also don't love the college system of handing each team
possession in what would already amount to pro field goal range.
I don't think the regular-season overtime rules should be changed.
In the playoffs, while I think the current rule is fine, I think a more
equitable solution would be to play out a full 15-minute fifth quarter in
overtime unless one team gets a lead of nine points or more, at which point the
game would end. In that scenario, the Chiefs would be guaranteed a possession,
but if they were stopped, the Pats would be able to win with a field goal. If
the score is tied at the end of the fifth quarter, then I think you go to
sudden death with the next score of any kind winning the game.
TOM BRADY THROWS
AN INTERCEPTION IN THE END ZONE TO REGGIE
RAGLAND
SITUATION: Third-and-goal on the Chiefs' 1-yard
line, 13:45 to go in the second quarter
SCORE: Patriots lead 7-0
The Patriots had their own issues in turning early-game
dominance into an unassailable lead, owing to an ill-timed Brady interception.
They picked on Kansas City's linebackers all game by stretching them with the
run and throwing to James White
and Rex Burkhead,
but Ragland came up with a critical interception by immediately sniffing out a
play-fake and sneaking into a throwing lane just in time to pick off a pass
intended for Rob
Gronkowski. If Mahomes would have made that sort of pass, we would
have blamed it on youthful exuberance and inexperience.
Instead, Brady was the one who was picked off in the red
zone, which marked the sixth red zone interception for the future Hall of Famer
on his 238th red zone pass attempt in the postseason. It was too small of a
window, and while Brady still has plenty of zip when he absolutely needs it, it
was a bad decision given the game situation. It cost the Patriots a minimum of
three points and possibly more, given that Belichick might very well have gone
for it on the 1-yard line.
Brady would have a second interception later in the game
bounce off of the hands of Edelman and into those of Chiefs safety Daniel
Sorensen, who had come up with a big play earlier in the half ...
SORENSEN STUFFS
BURKHEAD ON FOURTH DOWN
SITUATION: Fourth-and-1 on the Chiefs' 25-yard
line, 9:38 to go in the fourth quarter
SCORE: Patriots lead 17-14
Everyone said the same thing after the Patriots' running
back was stuffed: Why didn't Brady just sneak the ball for a first down? I
strongly suspect that Brady has the ability to get the ball and sneak on his
own without having it called for him in the huddle, although he didn't appear
to kill any sneak at the line before handing the ball to Burkhead, as he did on
the subsequent fourth-and-1 touchdown run by Sony Michel.
The decision to go for it on fourth-and-1 was just fine. Was
the playcall to hand the ball to Burkhead on an interior run a good idea? I
think it's OK, and I also expect Brady had the ability to check out of it if he
thought it wasn't going to work. The Patriots love rushing to the line and
using outside zone in short-yardage near the goal line, and when they rushed up
to the line here, it was fair to wonder if that was going to be the playcall.
The Pats had gashed the Chiefs on the ground all day, and 32 of their 35
carries had gained at least one yard, with none of their rushes losing yardage.
To be fair, two of their three stuffs had come with Michel in short yardage,
both on the second-and-goal run before the Ragland interception and on a
third-and-1 at midfield. I'm willing to give the Pats the benefit of the doubt
in their offensive decision-making.
THE REFEREES
OVERTURN JULIAN
EDELMAN'S MUFFED PUNT RETURN
SITUATION: Fourth-and-8 from the Chiefs' 27-yard
line, 8:47 to go
SCORE: Patriots lead 17-14
This one ended up not mattering all that much when Brady
threw the interception two plays later, but it was a flashpoint for the
frustrating officiating day. I had half of my Twitter timeline saying that
Edelman definitely touched the ball and the other half saying it didn't come
anywhere near the Patriots' returner. Gene Steratore, calling the game for CBS,
pieced together two replay angles to suggest that the ball conclusively had not
touched Edelman on the thumbs. I also don't believe it touched Edelman, but I
don't know that it was conclusive enough to justify overturning the call on the
field.
MAHOMES HITS SAMMY WATKINS FOR
A 38-YARD COMPLETION
SITUATION: Second-and-10 from the Patriots'
40-yard line, 2:54 to go
SCORE: Patriots lead 24-21
Had the Patriots lost, this play would have come under more
scrutiny, because it was pretty clearly offensive pass interference. Both these
teams love pick plays, but you have to either design the play to at least give
a pretense of avoiding the defender or have the pick come within one yard of
the line of scrimmage. Watch the play and you'll see that the pick from Chris Conley
clearly takes place three yards downfield. Belichick tried to show the refs
afterward and was frustrated enough to take out his anger on his tablet.
J.C. JACKSON COMMITS
PASS INTERFERENCE ON WATKINS
SITUATION: Second-and-10 from the Chiefs'
37-yard line, 3:07 to go
SCORE: Patriots lead 24-21
Two plays earlier, Jackson helped push the ball downfield
with a critical defensive holding penalty. The Chiefs got plenty of calls in
their favor in the second half, although they'll mostly be forgotten in the
years to come as people remember the Edelman review and the Jones foul. I'm not
saying that to suggest that the calls were unwarranted, just that they
mattered.
Jackson was a mess in the second half. Kelce beat him on a
skinny post for the Chiefs' first touchdown. He committed pass interference on
a ball thrown behind Kelce in the end zone, took a holding penalty that wiped
away a Kelce fumble, and then added a second pass interference call for 28
yards to push the Chiefs over midfield. The Patriots surprised the Chiefs by
starting the game with an unexpected set of cornerback matchups. They stuck
Jackson on Kelce, put All-Pro Stephon
Gilmore on Watkins, and used a combination of Jonathan
Jones and rookie seventh-rounder Keion Crossen on Tyreek Hill.
It worked during the first half, when Mahomes went 4-of-8
for 65 yards and took three sacks. It kept Hill out of the game, as the Chiefs'
star wideout got open past Crossen on one deep play for 42 yards but had no
other catches. The Chiefs adjusted and went to Watkins, who had one big play on
a scramble drill past Gilmore and picked on lesser cornerbacks when the
Patriots went away from Gilmore in the second half. He finished with 114 yards
on eight targets. Kelce had a touchdown and drew that pass interference penalty,
but he racked up only three catches for 23 yards amid double coverage.
The Chiefs were able to spring Kareem Hunt for
big plays in the receiving game the last two times these teams played, and
without Hunt in this game, they were still able to create passing plays for
their backs. Spencer Ware had
a 21-yard catch late in the game, and Damien
Williams racked up five catches for 66 yards and two
touchdowns, along with a third as a runner. It should have been more...
MAHOMES MISSES A
WIDE-OPEN WILLIAMS FOR A TOUCHDOWN
SITUATION: First-and-10 from the Patriots'
23-yard line, 4:42 left in the second quarter
SCORE: Patriots lead 7-0
In the regular-season matchup between these two teams, Mahomes
missed Hunt going up the sideline on a wheel route for a touchdown. On Sunday,
he did the exact same thing in the second quarter. The Chiefs executed a legal
pick with Kelce at the line of scrimmage on Kyle Van Noy, and with Williams
running a wheel route uncovered out of the backfield, this should have been an
easy touchdown. The drive should have produced a touchdown. Instead, after
Mahomes took a huge sack on third down, the Chiefs were forced to punt.
MAHOMES RECOVERS A
FUMBLE AT THE END OF THE FIRST HALF
SITUATION: First-and-10 from the Chiefs' 42-yard
line, 21 seconds left in the second quarter
SCORE: Patriots lead 14-0
Mahomes quietly helped keep the Chiefs in a game with
a fumble recovery that didn't seem like much at the time. After
a long kickoff return, Reid threw Mahomes onto the field with 21 seconds left
and two timeouts in the hopes of getting a throw into field goal range.
The second-year quarterback was immediately strip-sacked by
Van Noy but tracked down the fumble and recovered it on his own 27-yard line.
Had the Pats fallen on the football, they would have likely come away with
three points. The rest of the game might have gone differently from there, but
the Chiefs ended up needing those three points by the end of the night.
No comments:
Post a Comment